|
HARDYSTON
— Assemblyman Guy Gregg, R-Sussex, is in the minority in Trenton,
but it is not a usual occurrence for him in this Republican-heavy county.
At a Monday candidates night, Gregg found himself in that position as
he addressed 100 members of the Crystal Springs Tax Action Committee,
the majority of whom favor reducing property taxes by primarily funding
education with income taxes instead of property taxes.
Gregg said he is not opposed to the idea, but wants to address state spending
at the same time. “I think property taxes is the wrong way to fund
education,” Gregg said. However, “We will never do it just
by looking at revenue,” he continued.
The
other two candidates at the event, state Senate candidate Jim Morrison
and Assembly candidate Thomas
Boyle, both Democrats, strongly support reforming education funding.
Gregg’s running mates in the Nov. 4 election — state Sen.
Robert Littell and Assemblyman Alison Littell McHose, both R-Sussex —
are not public supporters of the idea.
Neither attended the event.
Littell was expected, but never showed at the two-hour event. McHose attended
a fund-raiser for her campaign instead of the event.
Morrison and Boyle won favors with the majority of the crowd for their
support to a proposal known as the Save Money and Reform Taxes —
or SMART — Bill. It proposes to shift
90 percent of educational funding from property taxes to income taxes.
It is not an official piece of legislation, but is currently being crafted
into one by the state Office of Legislative Services.
Boyle said he was amazed at how simply the proposal solves the property
tax problem.
“When I saw it, I said, ‘It’s too good to be true. ...
It’s too simple,” he said. “We need to not be afraid
to talk about taxes. Politicians these days are too afraid to talk about
taxes.”
Morrison said he favors the proposal because it shifts education funding
from a regressive to a progressive tax. “The system should be based
on your ability to pay, not the property you own,” Morrison said.
“It’s insane and it’s got to change.”
Gregg held his own fairly well, answering numerous questions from the
reform proponents asking for his property tax reduction plan. Gregg said
his plan involves placing reasonable caps on state and local spending
while making education a top priority in the state budget. In addition,
any tax increases will have to be passed by a super majority of state
legislators.
A few group members interviewed after the event said Gregg’s proposals
have promise, but they are seeking immediate property tax relief. “They
all address cost containment, which is a good thing, but none of his address
property tax reform, which means finding another way to fund education,”
said Bob Weeks, a Crystal Springs
resident.
Gregg has proposed his plan in the form of four constitutional amendments
which have bipartisan support, he said. “The key is to get bills
or resolutions that are going to get to committee,” he said. “When
people say tax reform, people hear tax increase. That doesn’t play
well in the real world.”
Morrison was not scared off. “It is an increase ... I’m not
afraid to say that,” he said. “An increase in taxes on people
who aren’t bearing their fair share.”
The Smart Bill would raise taxes on people making more than $200,000 annually.
Such people constitute 5.2 percent of the state. Boyle, too, said he would
not be shy to fight for the proposal. “If I have to go down on the
floor and yell and scream at the top of my lungs, that’s what I’ll
do,” he said. Debate among Boyle, Morrison and Gregg was thoughtful
and passionate, light on anger and accusations. The event even had a few
surprising and somewhat humorous moments as the usually liberal Morrison
concurred with the usually conservative Gregg.
“It sounds like when Tom Boyle and Guy Gregg go to the Assembly
and I go to the Senate, we’ll get things done,” Morrison said.
“Is that an endorsement?” Gregg asked, amused.
“Perhaps,” Morrison said.
Democratic freeholder candidates Howard Burrell and Edwin Selby attended
the event and lobbied for some votes in the crowd. Neither of
their opponents — freeholders Glen Vetrano and Susan Zellman —
attended, though Freeholder JoAnn D’Angeli did, but she is not up
for re-election.
|